Sunday 31 January 2010

Investments

Love me not
for the man I be
Love me for what I can be

Love me so
that I can be
The man that is that I can be

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

It should be the other way, damn it!!
Natekar :)

Anonymous said...

I was pleasantly surprised to have you commenting on one of my posts!
Well, this particular one wasn't directed towards the female species, but towards placement officials who have no way of sighting latent brilliance. Hehe :D

Anonymous said...

well now, that makes more sense!
yeah, i thought i should get in on the action :)
I've told you this before but once again great posts dude, love 'em all :)

Prasad Vaidya said...

Superb!! Simply superb word play!!

Anirudh said...

Great insights are oft rediscovered over the centuries.

"Treat people as if they were what they ought to be and you help them become what they are capable of being." — Goethe

Abhishek Rao said...

But who gets to decide what someone ought to be? Isn't having an idea for what someone should be like imposing upon them, taking away their free will and their capability to think for themselves?

Anirudh said...

Likely a bad translation from the German. I would read 'ought to be' as 'could be'.